The claim that unnamed crypto exchange rivals lobbied against CZ’s presidential pardon bid reads like industry gossip. For anyone with meaningful funds on Binance, it surfaces a concrete question: after a $4.3B settlement with US authorities, a four-month prison sentence ending in September 2024, and a full CEO handover to Richard Teng, does Binance’s founder still carry enough influence over the platform to affect your risk exposure? The pardon story, sourced by CoinTelegraph on 10 May 2026, matters not because of the politics but because of what it signals: Binance’s regulatory standing remains an active competitive weapon, and rival exchanges have financial incentives to keep it that way. This review skips the drama and focuses on what traders need to know: how Binance’s compliance posture has changed structurally, where real risks remain, and who should be using the platform in 2026.
The CZ pardon story — what was reported, what rivals allegedly did, and why it matters now
CoinTelegraph reported on 10 May 2026 that Changpeng Zhao, Binance’s founder, claims competing crypto exchanges lobbied against his bid for a US presidential pardon. No specific exchanges were named, and the lobbying activity has not been independently confirmed. CZ completed a four-month federal prison sentence in September 2024 following a guilty plea to anti-money-laundering violations, part of Binance’s $4.3B settlement with the US Department of Justice.
The motive is plain. CZ’s conviction created a reputational liability that Binance has spent significant resources managing. A presidential pardon would clear his federal record, potentially restoring his capacity to advocate publicly for Binance in regulatory discussions. For competing exchanges, sustained pressure on Binance is commercially useful. The allegation, even unverified, is credible on its face.
The implications for users are narrower. The pardon bid’s outcome does not change Binance’s current compliance obligations, which flow from the DOJ settlement, not CZ’s personal legal status. Richard Teng remains CEO. The compliance monitorship continues regardless.
Quick answer
- Binance is operationally stable in 2026, with Richard Teng as CEO and a DOJ compliance monitor overseeing AML and KYC procedures since late 2023.
- CZ’s pardon bid, and alleged rival opposition to it, does not materially change Binance’s platform risk for most active traders.
- Ongoing risks are jurisdiction-specific: US persons cannot access Binance.com, and access restrictions exist in other regulated markets.
- Best for high-volume traders who want deep liquidity and broad token selection outside restricted jurisdictions.
- Avoid if you need a fully licensed exchange in a heavily regulated market, or if CZ’s residual public profile is a governance concern for your institution.
Evidence snapshot
| Fact | Detail | Source / limit |
|---|---|---|
| Pardon story published | 2026-05-10 | CoinTelegraph |
| Named rival exchanges | None identified | CoinTelegraph report |
| CZ prison sentence | Four months, completed September 2024 | DOJ proceedings |
| DOJ settlement amount | $4.3B | DOJ press release |
| CEO since November 2023 | Richard Teng | Binance public announcement |
| Compliance monitor | Ongoing DOJ requirement | DOJ settlement terms |
| Standard spot fee | 0.1% maker/taker; BNB discounts apply | Binance fee schedule |
| SAFU fund | Publicly disclosed emergency reserve; current balance on proof-of-reserves page | Binance disclosure |
| US person access | Binance.com not available to US persons | Binance terms of service |
Fit / not-fit
Best for traders who need broad token coverage, high spot and derivatives liquidity, and operate from jurisdictions where Binance holds an active license. The platform suits experienced users comfortable with self custody practices and those who hold BNB to reduce per-trade fees over time.
Avoid if you are US-based, if your institution requires an exchange with no outstanding regulatory proceedings, or if governance transparency from a publicly listed entity is a hard requirement. Compare alternatives across the major exchanges for 2026 before committing capital; licensing profiles differ substantially.
How Binance has structurally changed since the $4.3B settlement — compliance and leadership timeline
Binance’s structural compliance changes since late 2023 are more substantive than the pardon story implies. The milestones:
- November 2023: CZ resigns as CEO; Richard Teng, a former MAS-regulated exchange executive, is appointed.
- November 2023: DOJ settlement finalized at $4.3B, including a compliance monitor embedded within Binance operations.
- 2024: Binance implements enhanced KYC tiers and restricts or removes access in several jurisdictions not previously limited.
- September 2024: CZ’s prison sentence concludes.
- 2025 to 2026: Binance renews or acquires regional licenses in multiple markets; compliance monitor remains active.
For a detailed look at how Binance’s market surveillance practices have evolved alongside these changes, see the Binance RAVE probe and market surveillance review.
The monitorship deserves close attention. A fine gets paid and closed; an ongoing monitorship gives regulators continuous visibility into internal controls. That limits the scenarios where Binance could regress to pre-settlement practices without consequence.
Pros & cons — Binance’s genuine strengths and the risks that remain unresolved in 2026
Pros
- Deep spot and futures liquidity across a wide range of trading pairs, consistently ranking among the top venues by order book depth.
- 0.1% standard spot fee with further reductions for BNB holders, competitive for traders executing at volume.
- SAFU emergency reserve fund as a user protection layer, with balance disclosed on the proof-of-reserves page.
- Active compliance monitor provides more external oversight than most unregulated offshore exchanges offer.
- Broad product range: spot, futures, options, staking, launchpad, and copy trading under one account.
Cons
- US persons cannot access Binance.com. The separate Binance.US entity has faced independent regulatory challenges.
- CZ retains public visibility and continues to make statements, including the pardon story, that keep Binance’s regulatory history in the news cycle.
- The DOJ monitorship, while providing external oversight, also signals that compliance remediation is still in progress rather than concluded.
- Jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction access restrictions mean some users may find previously available products restricted without prior notice.
- The competitive dynamic implied by the pardon allegation suggests Binance’s regulatory status is still being used as a lever by competitors, a pattern unlikely to resolve quickly.
How to weigh Binance against alternatives when regulatory trust is the deciding factor
When regulatory trust is the primary criterion, the comparison shifts from fees and features to licensing structure and oversight accountability.
Exchanges that are publicly listed, or that operate under MAS, FCA, or MiCA-registered entities, carry different accountability structures than Binance. The DOJ monitorship does create a form of external oversight that many offshore exchanges lack entirely. Which risk you prioritize is the real decision: a resolved enforcement history with ongoing monitoring, or an exchange with no material regulatory history at all.
For traders where fee efficiency and liquidity are primary, Binance remains competitive. For those where institutional or jurisdictional compliance is the deciding factor, reviewing the full 2026 exchange comparison will surface alternatives with licensing profiles matched to specific requirements.
Risk boundary
This article is produced by Cex101 as a comparison and educational resource. It is not personalized financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Binance’s fees, products, SAFU fund balance, promotional campaigns, KYC requirements, and jurisdictional access may change after this article’s publication date. The CZ pardon story and related regulatory developments are ongoing and may evolve materially. Verify current terms, licensing status, and product availability directly on Binance’s official website before making any trading or custody decisions.
Verdict — who should use Binance in 2026, and what to monitor going forward
Binance remains a viable choice for most non-US traders in 2026. The compliance infrastructure installed under the DOJ settlement (the monitorship, enhanced KYC, and the leadership transition to Richard Teng) represents a genuine structural shift, not surface repositioning. The pardon story reveals competitive dynamics in the exchange industry, not platform instability.
Users who should reconsider are those in jurisdictions where Binance’s license status is uncertain, those whose institutions require clean regulatory records from their exchange partners, and those for whom CZ’s ongoing public presence creates governance concerns. For everyone else, the platform’s liquidity depth, product breadth, and standard 0.1% spot fee rate remain arguments in its favor.
If you are opening a new account and want to reduce per-trade costs from the outset, use the Starter Code CEX101 when registering. The fee reduction applies to standard maker/taker rates and is a fixed account-level benefit, not a time-limited campaign.
Cex101 earns a commission if you register through links on this site. This does not affect our editorial assessments. See our affiliate terms for details.
